← 返回

Usefulness of metabolic score for insulin resistance to predict restenosis after coronary stent implantation.

Usefulness of metabolic score for insulin resistance to predict restenosis after coronary stent implantation.

期刊: Annals of medicine 日期: 2026-12-01 PMID: 42261261 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2026.2679841 浏览: 49
作者: Tang J, Xu P, Guo J, Hao P
J, T., P, X., J, G., & P, H. (2026). Usefulness of metabolic score for insulin resistance to predict restenosis after coronary stent implantation.. Annals of medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2679841
J T, P X, J G, P H. Usefulness of metabolic score for insulin resistance to predict restenosis after coronary stent implantation.. Annals of medicine. 2026; doi: 10.1080/07853890.2026.2679841
J T, P X, J G, et al. Usefulness of metabolic score for insulin resistance to predict restenosis after coronary stent implantation.[J]. Annals of medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2026.2679841.
@article{j2026,
  author = {Tang J and Xu P and Guo J and Hao P},
  title = {Usefulness of metabolic score for insulin resistance to predict restenosis after coronary stent implantation.},
  journal = {Annals of medicine},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1080/07853890.2026.2679841},
  note = {PMID: 42261261},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tang J
AU  - Xu P
AU  - Guo J
AU  - Hao P
TI  - Usefulness of metabolic score for insulin resistance to predict restenosis after coronary stent implantation.
T2  - Annals of medicine
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.1080/07853890.2026.2679841
AN  - PMID:42261261
ER  - 

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical forecasting potential of the Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance (METS-IR) as a reliable predictor for in-stent restenosis (ISR) among patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A total of 818 patients undergoing repeat coronary angiography for recurrent chest pain after percutaneous coronary intervention from 2022 to 2025 were retrospectively collected. Clinical, blood and angiography-related data were analyzed. The predictive efficacy of METS-IR was assessed through both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, along with receiver operating characteristic curves, for the evaluation of ISR (defined as 50% luminal narrowing) and severe ISR (defined as 70% luminal narrowing). RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between METS-IR and ISR. Patients with ISR >50% had higher METS-IR (42.30 ± 7.54 vs. 40.17 ± 6.31, p < 0.001), as did those with ISR >70% (43.05 ± 7.84 vs. 40.19 ± 6.29, p < 0.001). ISR prevalence increased with progressively across METS-IR tertiles (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed METS-IR as an independent predictor of ISR (OR 1.28 for ISR >50%, 1.51 for ISR >70%, p < 0.05). ROC analysis identified an optimal METS-IR cutoff of 42.27 for ISR >50% and ISR >70% (sensitivity 50%, specificity 63%). Furthermore, incorporating the tertiles of METS-IR into the fully adjusted model significantly enhanced the ability to discriminate ISR. CONCLUSION: Our findings established that elevated METS-IR levels were strongly correlated with an increased risk of in-stent restenosis, with a markedly pronounced impact on severe ISR (>70%). METS-IR can serve as a straightforward and practical predictor for risk stratification after coronary stent implantation.

AI 智能解读

相关文献

返回分类: 冠心病 查看原文 (DOI)
已选择 0 篇文献