🫀 海洋之心

心血管文献智能检索平台 · Cardiovascular Literature Platform

How to Replace the TQT Study-The Use of Concentration-QTc Modeling to Exclude a Small Effect of a Novel Drug on QT Interval: Historical Perspective and Implementation.

📚 期刊: Journal of clinical pharmacology 📅 发表: 0000-00-00 🔬 PMID: 42405644 🔗 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.70237 👁️ 浏览: 16

👤 作者: Darpo B, Ferber G, Hopkins SC, Litherland K, Sarapa N, Xue H, Kleiman R

心律失常

📑 引用格式

APA Vancouver 国标 GB/T 7714 BibTeX RIS
Darpo B, Ferber G, Hopkins SC, Litherland K, Sarapa N, Xue H, Kleiman R (0000). How to Replace the TQT Study-The Use of Concentration-QTc Modeling to Exclude a Small Effect of a Novel Drug on QT Interval: Historical Perspective and Implementation.. Journal of clinical pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70237

🔗 分享文献

📝 摘要

The initial ICH E14 guidance described the thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study with the purpose of evaluating whether a new drug has effects on the QTc interval. Following its adoption, concentration-QTc (C-QTc) modeling was applied to data from TQT studies, and results were comparable with those based on a "by time point" analysis. In 2014, the IQ-CSRC study demonstrated that a small study in healthy subjects using C-QTc as the primary analysis could detect mild drug-induced QTc prolongation. The study led to the revision of the E14 guidance in 2015, allowing the use of C-QTc modeling to exclude a QTc effect at the threshold of concern, 10 ms. The 2015 revision was the starting point for the use of C-QTc modeling applied to data from first-in-human (FIH) studies with the intent to waive requests for a designated TQT study. The 2022 revision (S7B/E14 Q&A) brought non-clinical studies into the decision process for a "definitive" QT evaluation. In this manuscript, the emergence of C-QTc analysis applied to FIH studies with the intent to waive the TQT study is described, and a survey of FDA labels and reviews of approved drugs since 2015 is shared. The uptake has been modest, with only 30% of approved drugs for which a TQT study would be expected using this approach, while a TQT study has been conducted in ∼70% of development programs. It can be expected that the 2022 S7B/E14 revision will increase the number of programs for which a TQT study can be replaced.

📝 阅读笔记

📄 相关文献

← 返回 心律失常 查看原文 →
已选 0 篇