Comparing Outcomes of Heartmate 3 and Heart Transplantation in Older Children With Dilated Cardiomyopathy-Can Transplantation be Delayed or Avoided?
WF, C., LA, P., JK, K., RS, C., D, K., JP, J., S, A., K, C., M, D., & G, V. (2026). Comparing Outcomes of Heartmate 3 and Heart Transplantation in Older Children With Dilated Cardiomyopathy-Can Transplantation be Delayed or Avoided?. Pediatric transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.70374
WF C, LA P, JK K, RS C, D K, JP J, et al. Comparing Outcomes of Heartmate 3 and Heart Transplantation in Older Children With Dilated Cardiomyopathy-Can Transplantation be Delayed or Avoided?. Pediatric transplantation. 2026; doi: 10.1111/petr.70374
WF C, LA P, JK K, et al. Comparing Outcomes of Heartmate 3 and Heart Transplantation in Older Children With Dilated Cardiomyopathy-Can Transplantation be Delayed or Avoided?[J]. Pediatric transplantation. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/petr.70374.
@article{wf2026,
author = {Carlo WF and Padilla LA and Kirklin JK and Cantor RS and Koehl D and Jacobs JP and Amdani S and Chatfield K and Desai M and Vaughn G},
title = {Comparing Outcomes of Heartmate 3 and Heart Transplantation in Older Children With Dilated Cardiomyopathy-Can Transplantation be Delayed or Avoided?},
journal = {Pediatric transplantation},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1111/petr.70374},
note = {PMID: 42334151},
}
TY - JOUR AU - Carlo WF AU - Padilla LA AU - Kirklin JK AU - Cantor RS AU - Koehl D AU - Jacobs JP AU - Amdani S AU - Chatfield K AU - Desai M AU - Vaughn G TI - Comparing Outcomes of Heartmate 3 and Heart Transplantation in Older Children With Dilated Cardiomyopathy-Can Transplantation be Delayed or Avoided? T2 - Pediatric transplantation PY - 2026 DO - 10.1111/petr.70374 AN - PMID:42334151 ER -
BACKGROUND: Children with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) usually undergo heart transplantation or a short-term bridge with a ventricular assist device. Heartmate 3 (HM3) may represent an appealing longer-term option, though pediatric data are limited. We analyzed two clinical registries and hypothesized that adolescents with DCM treated with either HM3 or transplant would present similar survival. METHODS: The Pedimacs and Pediatric Heart Transplant Society registries were queried for DCM patients ages 10-18 years treated with HM3 or transplant, between 2017 and 2022. Mortality and adverse events were reported. RESULTS: Ninety HM3 and 306 transplant patients were reported within the respective registries. There was a higher proportion of Black patients in the HM3 cohort (40% vs. 30% in the transplant cohort, p = 0.03). Twelve- and 36-month survival rates were both 94.4% for HM3 patients and were 99.3% and 95.6% for transplant patients. In the HM3 group, there were 66 transplants (median time of 2.8 months), 3 late explants for recovery, and 3 early deaths. Conditional 1-year survival for HM3 and transplant was 100% and 96.3%, respectively, at 3 years. In the HM3 group, bleeding, stroke, and device malfunction rates were low at ≤ $$ \le $$ 0.1 events per patient per year. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with DCM treated with either HM3 or transplant had excellent 3-year outcomes, though many HM3 pediatric patients are transplanted early after device placement. Safely supporting this group of patients for an extended duration with HM3 has implications for delaying/avoiding transplantation, longer-term patient survival, and donor organ availability.