← 返回

Remote person-centred care and long-term medication management in primary care: post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Remote person-centred care and long-term medication management in primary care: post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

期刊: BMJ open 日期: 2026-07-01 PMID: 42386302 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118720 浏览: 23
作者: Mannheimer S, Fors A, Holst A, Gyllensten H
S, M., A, F., A, H., & H, G. (2026). Remote person-centred care and long-term medication management in primary care: post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118720
S M, A F, A H, H G. Remote person-centred care and long-term medication management in primary care: post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.. BMJ open. 2026; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118720
S M, A F, A H, et al. Remote person-centred care and long-term medication management in primary care: post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.[J]. BMJ open. 2026. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118720.
@article{s2026,
  author = {Mannheimer S and Fors A and Holst A and Gyllensten H},
  title = {Remote person-centred care and long-term medication management in primary care: post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.},
  journal = {BMJ open},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118720},
  note = {PMID: 42386302},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mannheimer S
AU  - Fors A
AU  - Holst A
AU  - Gyllensten H
TI  - Remote person-centred care and long-term medication management in primary care: post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
T2  - BMJ open
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118720
AN  - PMID:42386302
ER  - 

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To explore refill adherence to prescribed treatment for chronic heart failure (CHF) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), during and after a remote person-centred care (PCC) intervention. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial cohort. SETTING: We used data from the PROTECT (Person-Centred Care at Distance) randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary care, which were linked to data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 222 participants from nine primary care centres were enrolled in PROTECT. This study included participants with dispensed medications for CHF and/or COPD, excluding those with multidose dispensing (intervention n=50; control n=49, 42% women, mean age 69 years). INTERVENTIONS: PROTECT evaluated a PCC intervention using a digital platform and structured telephone support in addition to usual care versus usual care alone. OUTCOME MEASURES: Refill adherence was compared between groups, defining appropriate medication supply as ≥80% of days covered over 2 years. We also examined associations between refill adherence and number of long-term conditions and medications. RESULTS: Refill adherence did not differ significantly between groups. A higher number of long-term conditions was associated with lower odds of refill adherence (adjusted OR (aOR) per additional condition: 0.71; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.97; p=0.041), as were more long-term medications (aOR per additional medication class: 0.84; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.98; p=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The PROTECT intervention did not improve refill adherence, suggesting that future person-centred interventions may require more structured medication-management focus. Increasing numbers of long-term conditions and medications were both associated with lower refill adherence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03183817.

AI 智能解读

相关文献

返回分类: 心衰 查看原文 (DOI)
已选择 0 篇文献