← 返回

The Barthel Index in Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure.

The Barthel Index in Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure.

期刊: Clinical cardiology 日期: 2026-07-01 PMID: 42423554 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70389 浏览: 24
作者: Zhu K, Zhu H, Li X, Chen J, Lu D, Fan X
K, Z., H, Z., X, L., J, C., D, L., & X, F. (2026). The Barthel Index in Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure.. Clinical cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70389
K Z, H Z, X L, J C, D L, X F. The Barthel Index in Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure.. Clinical cardiology. 2026; doi: 10.1002/clc.70389
K Z, H Z, X L, et al. The Barthel Index in Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure.[J]. Clinical cardiology. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/clc.70389.
@article{k2026,
  author = {Zhu K and Zhu H and Li X and Chen J and Lu D and Fan X},
  title = {The Barthel Index in Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure.},
  journal = {Clinical cardiology},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1002/clc.70389},
  note = {PMID: 42423554},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zhu K
AU  - Zhu H
AU  - Li X
AU  - Chen J
AU  - Lu D
AU  - Fan X
TI  - The Barthel Index in Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure.
T2  - Clinical cardiology
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.1002/clc.70389
AN  - PMID:42423554
ER  - 

摘要

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response in heart failure (HF) patients is multifactorial, with limited data on its association with activities of daily living assessed by the Barthel index (BI). OBJECTIVE: This prospective observational study investigated the predictive value of BI for CRT response and long-term clinical outcomes in non-ischemic HF patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). METHODS: A total of 271 consecutive non-ischemic HF patients undergoing CRT with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and LBBB were enrolled. BI was evaluated pre-implantation. The primary endpoint was CRT response (absolute LVEF improvement ≥ 5% at 6 months). The secondary composite endpoint included all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (HFH). RESULTS: Among 249 patients completing 6-month follow-up, the CRT response rate was 68.67%. Multivariate logistic regression identified BI (per 5-point increment; OR = 1.37, 95% CI:1.12-1.67, p = 0.002) as an independent predictor of CRT response, with an optimal cutoff of 95. Combining BI with left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left bundle branch area pacing achieved the highest predictive efficacy (AUC = 0.78). Over a median 33.94-month follow-up, BI > 95 was associated with an 88% reduced risk of the composite endpoint (adjusted HR = 0.116, p < 0.001), driven primarily by marked HFH reduction. A non-significant trend toward lower all-cause mortality was observed, accompanied by sustained LVEF improvement (29.81% ± 5.01% to 51.71% ± 11.30%). CONCLUSION: BI might be a simple, cost-effective independent predictor for CRT response and improved LVEF and prognosis in non-ischemic HF patients with LBBB.

AI 智能解读

相关文献

返回分类: 心律失常 查看原文 (DOI)
已选择 0 篇文献