Contemporary patients with atrial fibrillation are not anticoagulated despite risks of stroke - Insights from GARDENIA.
AK, K., MP, B., RP, G., K, P., D, B., B, H., J, S., D, F., S, P., & S, V. (2026). Contemporary patients with atrial fibrillation are not anticoagulated despite risks of stroke - Insights from GARDENIA.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354382
AK K, MP B, RP G, K P, D B, B H, et al. Contemporary patients with atrial fibrillation are not anticoagulated despite risks of stroke - Insights from GARDENIA.. PloS one. 2026; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354382
AK K, MP B, RP G, et al. Contemporary patients with atrial fibrillation are not anticoagulated despite risks of stroke - Insights from GARDENIA.[J]. PloS one. 2026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354382.
@article{ak2026,
author = {Kakkar AK and Bonaca MP and Giugliano RP and Pieper K and Bloomfield D and Hug B and Salter J and Freedholm D and Parkar S and Virdone S},
title = {Contemporary patients with atrial fibrillation are not anticoagulated despite risks of stroke - Insights from GARDENIA.},
journal = {PloS one},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0354382},
note = {PMID: 42520044},
}
TY - JOUR AU - Kakkar AK AU - Bonaca MP AU - Giugliano RP AU - Pieper K AU - Bloomfield D AU - Hug B AU - Salter J AU - Freedholm D AU - Parkar S AU - Virdone S TI - Contemporary patients with atrial fibrillation are not anticoagulated despite risks of stroke - Insights from GARDENIA. T2 - PloS one PY - 2026 DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0354382 AN - PMID:42520044 ER -
BACKGROUND: GARDENIA is a global, multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study in high-risk atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, who were untreated with anticoagulants. OBJECTIVES: Provide contemporary evidence on reasons for non-treatment with an anticoagulant, and outcomes in high-risk AF patients. METHODS: GARDENIA enrolled 704 AF patients with a CHA2DS2-VA score ≥2 and an elevated risk of bleeding (older age (≥70 years), reduced renal function, concomitant antiplatelet or NSAID use, or other conditions associated with increased bleeding risk), and had not been recently treated with an oral anticoagulant (OAC). Patients were followed for at least 4 months. The two-year risks of mortality, stroke and major bleeding with or without direct OACs (DOACs) in these patients was estimated using the GARFIELD risk score. RESULTS: History of major bleeding (18.7%), physician-assessed high-risk of bleeding (17.1%), and patient refusal (17.6%) were the top reasons for not initiating OACs. The 100-person-year event rates (95% CI) for mortality, stroke/systemic embolism (SE)/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and ISTH major bleeding were 13.22 (10.33, 16.92), 2.12 (1.14, 3.94), and 2.21 (1.13, 3.91), respectively. GARFIELD risk analysis indicated a 31% and 40% increase in the risk of mortality and stroke, respectively, and a ~ 30% decrease in risk of major bleeding, compared to the estimated risk, had the patients been anticoagulated. The study was prematurely terminated due to low rate of patient accrual. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived risk of bleeding was the leading cause for non-treatment with OACs in high-risk AF patients. Risk prediction modelling indicated that the benefits of anticoagulation in stroke and mortality reduction outweigh the risk of bleeding.