Cost-effectiveness of inclisiran in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease from Chinese healthcare perspective.
M, L., X, Z., M, F., Q, H., & Z, F. (2026). Cost-effectiveness of inclisiran in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease from Chinese healthcare perspective.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350294
M L, X Z, M F, Q H, Z F. Cost-effectiveness of inclisiran in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease from Chinese healthcare perspective.. PloS one. 2026; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350294
M L, X Z, M F, et al. Cost-effectiveness of inclisiran in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease from Chinese healthcare perspective.[J]. PloS one. 2026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350294.
@article{m2026,
author = {Liu M and Zhang X and Feng M and He Q and Feng Z},
title = {Cost-effectiveness of inclisiran in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease from Chinese healthcare perspective.},
journal = {PloS one},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0350294},
note = {PMID: 42207773},
}
TY - JOUR AU - Liu M AU - Zhang X AU - Feng M AU - He Q AU - Feng Z TI - Cost-effectiveness of inclisiran in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease from Chinese healthcare perspective. T2 - PloS one PY - 2026 DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0350294 AN - PMID:42207773 ER -
BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) imposes a substantial clinical and economic burden in China. Despite maximally tolerated statin therapy, many patients fail to achieve recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets. Inclisiran, a novel small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) therapy, provides sustained LDL-C reduction, but its economic value under the Chinese healthcare system remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of inclisiran when added to standard lipid-lowering therapy for patients with ASCVD in China. METHODS: A Markov cohort multistate-transition model was developed from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, using a one-year cycle length and a lifetime horizon. Clinical inputs, costs, and utilities were derived from published literature and clinical trials. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at 4.5% annually. The primary result of the economic evaluation was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with inclisiran considered cost-effective if the ICER was below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CNY 191,498 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), equivalent to two times China's per capita gross domestic product in 2024. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared with statin therapy alone, inclisiran added to statin therapy yielded an additional 0.41 QALYs and incurred incremental costs of CNY 58,321.35, resulting in an ICER of CNY 143,044.57/QALY, which is well below the WTP threshold. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the mortality reduction effect, discount rate, and inclisiran price were the main drivers of model outcomes; however, inclisiran remained cost-effective across all tested scenarios. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 95.1% probability that inclisiran is cost-effective at the current price. CONCLUSIONS: At its current negotiated price of CNY 2,790 per dose, inclisiran added to standard therapy is cost-effective for patients with ASCVD in China.