Sofia, V.C.A., Óscar, B.F., J, P.J., Josepa, M., Ariadna, S.E., William, W., Niek, K., & Dionne, K. (2026). Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study.. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110266
Sofia VCA, Óscar BF, J PJ, Josepa M, Ariadna SE, William W, et al. Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study.. BMJ open. 2026; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110266
Sofia VCA, Óscar BF, J PJ, et al. Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study.[J]. BMJ open. 2026. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110266.
@article{sofia2026,
author = {V Carvalho Ana Sofia and Brito Fernandes Óscar and Piek Jan J and Mauri Josepa and Sanz Escartin Ariadna and Wijns William and Klazinga Niek and Kringos Dionne},
title = {Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study.},
journal = {BMJ open},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110266},
note = {PMID: 41651533},
}
TY - JOUR AU - V Carvalho Ana Sofia AU - Brito Fernandes Óscar AU - Piek Jan J AU - Mauri Josepa AU - Sanz Escartin Ariadna AU - Wijns William AU - Klazinga Niek AU - Kringos Dionne TI - Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study. T2 - BMJ open PY - 2026 DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110266 AN - PMID:41651533 ER -
OBJECTIVES: To develop a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe, informed by stakeholder insights on the impact of COVID-19, emerging innovations and recommendations to enhance resilience. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study comprising three phases: (1) survey among European cardiac care providers; (2) five multistakeholder focus groups and (3) participatory tool development. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analysed thematically. SETTING: The survey targeted cardiology professionals from the 27 European Union Member States and Ukraine who worked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Focus group participants were purposefully sampled to represent clinical, organisational and policy perspectives. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 177 survey respondents and 40 informants in focus groups. RESULTS: Six key resilience dimensions of cardiac care pathways were identified: workforce, organisation of care delivery, governance and trust, communication and cooperation, medical devices and products, and data collection and use. Staff shortages and infrastructure capacity were key challenges during the pandemic. The most frequent measures were the reallocation of health staff (75%; n=133) and repurposing infrastructures (38%; n=32). Participants discussed the six resilience dimensions around a total of 17 subdimensions and 39 recommended actions to enhance resilience were identified. The resulting resilience assessment tool included four components: (1) mapping a context-specific cardiac care pathway; (2) stakeholder identification critical to participate in collective self-assessment; (3) a preparedness checklist generating a visual heat map and (4) a resource toolkit. CONCLUSIONS: The resilience assessment tool offers step-by-step guidance to strengthening cardiac care pathways across six key resilience dimensions, supported by actionable recommendations. The tool enables the identification of context-specific vulnerabilities and improvement priorities, thereby supporting healthcare professionals and policymakers in enhancing preparedness and ensuring care continuity before, during and after crises. Its implementation is currently being piloted in European hospitals to evaluate and refine its practical applicability.