← 返回

Histopathological Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Using Transformer-Based Artificial Intelligence: Model Comparison Study.

Histopathological Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Using Transformer-Based Artificial Intelligence: Model Comparison Study.

期刊: JMIR medical informatics 日期: 2026-06-04 PMID: 42241702 DOI: 10.2196/80403 浏览: 50
作者: Liu C, Xu M, Lv Y, Zhu Z, Pan Y, Wang Y
C, L., M, X., Y, L., Z, Z., Y, P., & Y, W. (2026). Histopathological Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Using Transformer-Based Artificial Intelligence: Model Comparison Study.. JMIR medical informatics. https://doi.org/10.2196/80403
C L, M X, Y L, Z Z, Y P, Y W. Histopathological Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Using Transformer-Based Artificial Intelligence: Model Comparison Study.. JMIR medical informatics. 2026; doi: 10.2196/80403
C L, M X, Y L, et al. Histopathological Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Using Transformer-Based Artificial Intelligence: Model Comparison Study.[J]. JMIR medical informatics. 2026. DOI: 10.2196/80403.
@article{c2026,
  author = {Liu C and Xu M and Lv Y and Zhu Z and Pan Y and Wang Y},
  title = {Histopathological Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Using Transformer-Based Artificial Intelligence: Model Comparison Study.},
  journal = {JMIR medical informatics},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.2196/80403},
  note = {PMID: 42241702},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Liu C
AU  - Xu M
AU  - Lv Y
AU  - Zhu Z
AU  - Pan Y
AU  - Wang Y
TI  - Histopathological Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Using Transformer-Based Artificial Intelligence: Model Comparison Study.
T2  - JMIR medical informatics
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.2196/80403
AN  - PMID:42241702
ER  - 

摘要

BACKGROUND: Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) poses diagnostic challenges due to complex histopathological changes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop an intelligent framework for evaluating MIRI on hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides, to compare major deep learning architectures, and to determine the advantages of transformer models across multiple interventions and time points. METHODS: A total of 1280 whole-slide images (~62,000 tiles) from public datasets were analyzed across antioxidant, β-blocker, calcium channel blocker, and control groups at 6, 24, and 72 hours. Seven model families (convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory networks, autoencoders, graph convolutional networks, variational autoencoders, and transformers) were trained under unified preprocessing, with generative adversarial networks used exclusively for leakage-free augmentation. Weak supervision used a clustering-constrained attention multiple-instance learning strategy, and segmentation applied a Transformer-UNet. Data were split into 8:1:1 at the subject level, with 5-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The transformer achieved the best performance (accuracy=0.942; area under the curve=0.982; and F1-score=0.958). Segmentation Dice scores were 0.847 (necrosis) and 0.821 (apoptosis). Predictions strongly agreed with expert measurements (r=0.886; Bland-Altman limits +5% or -5%), and attention maps aligned with necrotic borders and inflammatory foci. Temporal trends matched biological expectations, with the antioxidant group showing the most stable improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Transformer-based pathology offers accurate, robust, and interpretable assessment of MIRI and provides a scalable framework for dynamic injury quantification and therapeutic evaluation.

AI 智能解读

相关文献

返回分类: 心肌病 查看原文 (DOI)
已选择 0 篇文献