← 返回

Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Patterns and Placebo-Controlled Angina Relief With Percuatenous Coronary Intervention: ORBITA-2.

Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Patterns and Placebo-Controlled Angina Relief With Percuatenous Coronary Intervention: ORBITA-2.

期刊: J Am Coll Cardiol 日期: 2026-01-01 PMID: 42017887 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5126 浏览: 48
作者: Chiew Kayla, Foley Michael J, Chotai Shayna, Naderi Zahra, Rajkumar Christopher A, Ahmed-Jushuf Fiyyaz, Simader Florentina A, Ganesananthan Sharmananthan, Nagaraj Vaishaanth, Khandelwal Prachur, Hartley Adam, Keeble Thomas R, Ruparelia Neil, Seligman Henry, Francis Darrel P, Shun-Shin Matthew J, Al-Lamee Rasha K
Kayla, C., J, F.M., Shayna, C., Zahra, N., A, R.C., Fiyyaz, A.J., A, S.F., Sharmananthan, G., Vaishaanth, N., Prachur, K., Adam, H., R, K.T., Neil, R., Henry, S., P, F.D., J, S.S.M., & K, A.L.R. (2026). Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Patterns and Placebo-Controlled Angina Relief With Percuatenous Coronary Intervention: ORBITA-2.. J Am Coll Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5126
Kayla C, J FM, Shayna C, Zahra N, A RC, Fiyyaz AJ, et al. Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Patterns and Placebo-Controlled Angina Relief With Percuatenous Coronary Intervention: ORBITA-2.. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026; doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5126
Kayla C, J FM, Shayna C, et al. Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Patterns and Placebo-Controlled Angina Relief With Percuatenous Coronary Intervention: ORBITA-2.[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5126.
@article{kayla2026,
  author = {Chiew Kayla and Foley Michael J and Chotai Shayna and Naderi Zahra and Rajkumar Christopher A and Ahmed-Jushuf Fiyyaz and Simader Florentina A and Ganesananthan Sharmananthan and Nagaraj Vaishaanth and Khandelwal Prachur and Hartley Adam and Keeble Thomas R and Ruparelia Neil and Seligman Henry and Francis Darrel P and Shun-Shin Matthew J and Al-Lamee Rasha K},
  title = {Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Patterns and Placebo-Controlled Angina Relief With Percuatenous Coronary Intervention: ORBITA-2.},
  journal = {J Am Coll Cardiol},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5126},
  note = {PMID: 42017887},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Chiew Kayla
AU  - Foley Michael J
AU  - Chotai Shayna
AU  - Naderi Zahra
AU  - Rajkumar Christopher A
AU  - Ahmed-Jushuf Fiyyaz
AU  - Simader Florentina A
AU  - Ganesananthan Sharmananthan
AU  - Nagaraj Vaishaanth
AU  - Khandelwal Prachur
AU  - Hartley Adam
AU  - Keeble Thomas R
AU  - Ruparelia Neil
AU  - Seligman Henry
AU  - Francis Darrel P
AU  - Shun-Shin Matthew J
AU  - Al-Lamee Rasha K
TI  - Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Patterns and Placebo-Controlled Angina Relief With Percuatenous Coronary Intervention: ORBITA-2.
T2  - J Am Coll Cardiol
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5126
AN  - PMID:42017887
ER  - 

摘要

Unblinded studies have demonstrated superior procedural and clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in focal compared with diffuse coronary artery disease. However, data from the first placebo-controlled study did not demonstrate a differential impact of disease pattern on symptom endpoints. The study sought to test the ability of pattern of coronary artery disease to predict the placebo-controlled efficacy of PCI. In the ORBITA-2 (Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation with Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina-2) randomized placebo-controlled trial of angioplasty for stable angina, patients underwent prerandomization nonhyperemic pressure wire pullback assessments. Seven blinded interventional cardiologists independently reviewed each pullback trace to categorize disease patterns as focal, diffuse, or mixed. These were assigned numerical values of 1, 0, and 0.5, respectively. Overall disease pattern score was determined by the mean. A score >0.5 was considered focal and ≤0.5 was considered diffuse. Bayesian proportional odds modeling was used. A total of 245 patients with 300 target vessel pullbacks were analyzed. With adjustment for prerandomization nonhyperemic pressure ratio, PCI in focal compared with diffuse disease resulted in greater improvement in angina symptom score (OR: 1.80; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 1.48-2.18; Pr[Benefit] > 99.9%) and daily episodes of angina (OR: 1.55; 95% CrI: 1.26-1.89; Pr[Benefit] > 99.9%). Focal disease also predicted greater placebo-controlled benefit in exercise treadmill time (Pr[Interaction] > 99.9%), Canadian Cardiovascular Society class (Pr[Interaction] = 99.0%), EuroQol Group 5-Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire (Pr[Interaction] = 95.1%), and Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency (Pr[Interaction] = 99.5%). There was weaker evidence of interaction between disease pattern and the placebo-controlled impact of PCI on improvement in dobutamine stress echocardiography score (Pr[Interaction] = 83%). In focal disease, PCI resulted in greater placebo-controlled improvement of symptoms compared with diffuse disease. Physiological patterns of disease may be useful to guide treatment decision making with PCI for symptom relief.

AI 智能解读

相关文献

返回分类: 冠心病 查看原文 (DOI)
已选择 0 篇文献