Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Dysfunction in De Novo Organized Left Atrial Tachyarrhythmia: A Multicenter Pre-Ablation Study.
M, W., P, B., B, B., M, K., P, D., & T, K. (2026). Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Dysfunction in De Novo Organized Left Atrial Tachyarrhythmia: A Multicenter Pre-Ablation Study.. Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.). https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.70545
M W, P B, B B, M K, P D, T K. Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Dysfunction in De Novo Organized Left Atrial Tachyarrhythmia: A Multicenter Pre-Ablation Study.. Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.). 2026; doi: 10.1111/echo.70545
M W, P B, B B, et al. Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Dysfunction in De Novo Organized Left Atrial Tachyarrhythmia: A Multicenter Pre-Ablation Study.[J]. Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.). 2026. DOI: 10.1111/echo.70545.
@article{m2026,
author = {Wójcik M and Błaszkiewicz P and Bińkowski B and Kiliszek M and Denysiuk P and Kucejko T},
title = {Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Dysfunction in De Novo Organized Left Atrial Tachyarrhythmia: A Multicenter Pre-Ablation Study.},
journal = {Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1111/echo.70545},
note = {PMID: 42402187},
}
TY - JOUR AU - Wójcik M AU - Błaszkiewicz P AU - Bińkowski B AU - Kiliszek M AU - Denysiuk P AU - Kucejko T TI - Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Dysfunction in De Novo Organized Left Atrial Tachyarrhythmia: A Multicenter Pre-Ablation Study. T2 - Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) PY - 2026 DO - 10.1111/echo.70545 AN - PMID:42402187 ER -
PURPOSE: Whether de novo organized left atrial tachyarrhythmia (LAT) shows preserved left atrial appendage (LAA) mechanics has not been adequately characterized. We compared LAA peak emptying velocity across atrial fibrillation (AF) phenotypes and de novo LAT. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort of 634 consecutive first-ablation candidates undergoing pre-ablation transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at five centers: paroxysmal AF (PAF, n = 146), persistent AF (PeAF, n = 310), long-standing persistent AF (LsPeAF, n = 86), and LAT (n = 92). Markedly reduced LAA function was peak emptying velocity <25 cm/s. Multivariable regression adjusted for rhythm during TEE, CHA2DS2-VASc, body mass index (BMI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left atrial (LA) diameter. RESULTS: Mean LAA velocity was 55.7 ± 19.4 (PAF), 44.3 ± 18.5 (PeAF), 31.0 ± 12.5 (LsPeAF), and 36.6 ± 13.5 cm/s (LAT); p < 0.001. LAT lay closer to LsPeAF than to PAF and did not differ from LsPeAF (Tukey p = 0.140). Prevalence of velocity <25 cm/s: 2.7%, 11.9%, 32.6% and 18.5% (p < 0.001). After adjustment, larger LA diameter (β = -0.53/mm, p < 0.001) and higher CHA2DS2-VASc (β = -1.93/point, p < 0.001) were independently associated with lower velocity. Compared with LAT, PAF had lower odds of velocity <25 cm/s (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.62). CONCLUSION: De novo organized LAT exhibits LAA mechanical dysfunction comparable to long-standing persistent AF rather than to PAF. Organized rhythm does not imply preserved appendage function. LAA peak emptying velocity may serve as a functional remodeling marker for pre-ablation phenotyping.