← 返回

Triple Antithrombotic Therapy vs Dual Antiplatelet for Prevention of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Anterior Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Triple Antithrombotic Therapy vs Dual Antiplatelet for Prevention of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Anterior Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

期刊: Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinic 日期: 2026-01-01 PMID: 42427347 DOI: 10.1177/10760296261468426 浏览: 14
作者: Abomohsen M, Elkhayat I, Mohamed AE, Almakadma AH, Kholeif Z, Gadelmawla AF, Awashra A, Youssef MA, AlQassab O, Ghannam M
M, A., I, E., AE, M., AH, A., Z, K., AF, G., A, A., MA, Y., O, A., & M, G. (2026). Triple Antithrombotic Therapy vs Dual Antiplatelet for Prevention of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Anterior Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Meta-Analysis.. Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinic. https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296261468426
M A, I E, AE M, AH A, Z K, AF G, et al. Triple Antithrombotic Therapy vs Dual Antiplatelet for Prevention of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Anterior Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Meta-Analysis.. Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinic. 2026; doi: 10.1177/10760296261468426
M A, I E, AE M, et al. Triple Antithrombotic Therapy vs Dual Antiplatelet for Prevention of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Anterior Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Meta-Analysis.[J]. Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinic. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/10760296261468426.
@article{m2026,
  author = {Abomohsen M and Elkhayat I and Mohamed AE and Almakadma AH and Kholeif Z and Gadelmawla AF and Awashra A and Youssef MA and AlQassab O and Ghannam M},
  title = {Triple Antithrombotic Therapy vs Dual Antiplatelet for Prevention of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Anterior Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Meta-Analysis.},
  journal = {Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinic},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1177/10760296261468426},
  note = {PMID: 42427347},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Abomohsen M
AU  - Elkhayat I
AU  - Mohamed AE
AU  - Almakadma AH
AU  - Kholeif Z
AU  - Gadelmawla AF
AU  - Awashra A
AU  - Youssef MA
AU  - AlQassab O
AU  - Ghannam M
TI  - Triple Antithrombotic Therapy vs Dual Antiplatelet for Prevention of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Anterior Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
T2  - Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinic
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.1177/10760296261468426
AN  - PMID:42427347
ER  - 

摘要

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple antithrombotic therapy (TT) versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for prevention of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) following anterior myocardial infarction.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies comparing TT (DAPT plus anticoagulation) versus DAPT alone. The primary outcome was LVT formation. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, composite thromboembolism, bleeding, and net adverse clinical events (NACE). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261343867).ResultsSeven studies (2 randomized, 5 observational), including 2,273 patients (949 TT, 1,324 DAPT), were analyzed. TT was not associated with a reduction in LVT (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.21-1.49; p=0.25; I2=59%). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.27-2.06; p=0.58), ischemic cerebrovascular accidents (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.20-6.79), systemic embolism (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.27-1.75), or composite thromboembolism (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.42-2.19). TT was associated with increased major bleeding (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.40-5.68; p=0.004) and any bleeding (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.73-3.85; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in NACE (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.58-2.29).ConclusionIn anterior myocardial infarction, available evidence did not demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in LVT or thromboembolic events with TT compared with DAPT, while bleeding risk was increased. Given moderate heterogeneity, limited randomized evidence, and potential imaging-related under-detection of LVT, these findings do not support routine prophylactic TT and favor individualized risk-benefit assessment.

AI 智能解读

相关文献

返回分类: 心血管 查看原文 (DOI)
已选择 0 篇文献