Anonymous (2026). Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Energy Modalities for Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.. Heart rhythm.
Anonymous. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Energy Modalities for Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.. Heart rhythm. 2026; PMID: 42203053
Anonymous. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Energy Modalities for Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.[J]. Heart rhythm. 2026.
@article{paper2026,
author = {Anonymous},
title = {Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Energy Modalities for Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.},
journal = {Heart rhythm},
year = {2026},
note = {PMID: 42203053},
}
TY - JOUR AU - Anonymous TI - Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Energy Modalities for Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. T2 - Heart rhythm PY - 2026 AN - PMID:42203053 ER -
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has reshaped atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation landscape, yet the relative advantages and limitations of currently available catheter ablation energy modalities-radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoballoon ablation (CBA), laserballoon ablation (LBA), PFA, and lattice-tip dual-energy (LTD) ablation-remain incompletely understood.