← 返回

Large Animal Models of Tricuspid Regurgitation: Relevance, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Large Animal Models of Tricuspid Regurgitation: Relevance, Limitations, and Future Directions.

期刊: Journal of cardiovascular translational research 日期: 2026-06-08 PMID: 42260026 DOI: 10.1007/s12265-026-10798-0 浏览: 36
作者: Sukienik T, Nakamae K, Miyagi C, Yelisetty G, Hussaini SF, Watanabe T, Matsuda J, Yuhara S, Onohara D
T, S., K, N., C, M., G, Y., SF, H., T, W., J, M., S, Y., & D, O. (2026). Large Animal Models of Tricuspid Regurgitation: Relevance, Limitations, and Future Directions.. Journal of cardiovascular translational research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-026-10798-0
T S, K N, C M, G Y, SF H, T W, et al. Large Animal Models of Tricuspid Regurgitation: Relevance, Limitations, and Future Directions.. Journal of cardiovascular translational research. 2026; doi: 10.1007/s12265-026-10798-0
T S, K N, C M, et al. Large Animal Models of Tricuspid Regurgitation: Relevance, Limitations, and Future Directions.[J]. Journal of cardiovascular translational research. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s12265-026-10798-0.
@article{t2026,
  author = {Sukienik T and Nakamae K and Miyagi C and Yelisetty G and Hussaini SF and Watanabe T and Matsuda J and Yuhara S and Onohara D},
  title = {Large Animal Models of Tricuspid Regurgitation: Relevance, Limitations, and Future Directions.},
  journal = {Journal of cardiovascular translational research},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1007/s12265-026-10798-0},
  note = {PMID: 42260026},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Sukienik T
AU  - Nakamae K
AU  - Miyagi C
AU  - Yelisetty G
AU  - Hussaini SF
AU  - Watanabe T
AU  - Matsuda J
AU  - Yuhara S
AU  - Onohara D
TI  - Large Animal Models of Tricuspid Regurgitation: Relevance, Limitations, and Future Directions.
T2  - Journal of cardiovascular translational research
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.1007/s12265-026-10798-0
AN  - PMID:42260026
ER  - 

摘要

Despite growing interest in tricuspid regurgitation (TR), evidence remains insufficient to define the optimal timing of intervention and therapeutic strategies, highlighting the need for robust experimental models. Existing large animal models of TR use diverse approaches and can be grouped into two categories: direct valvular interventions targeting the tricuspid leaflets, annulus, or chordae, and indirect induction through mechanisms such as increased right ventricular loading, pulmonary hypertension, or pacing-induced tachycardia. Although direct valvular interventions can reproducibly induce TR and are well suited for modeling primary TR, clinically prevalent secondary TR is driven by annular dilation, leaflet tethering, and right-sided chamber remodeling rather than intrinsic valvular injury. This gap represents a major limitation in the field. In this review, we compare large animal models of TR and outline key considerations to guide model selection, with a focus on approaches that more faithfully reproduce the pathophysiology of TR for mechanistic and translational research.

AI 智能解读

相关文献

返回分类: 心血管 查看原文 (DOI)
已选择 0 篇文献