← 返回

Neonatal outcome in macrosomia and gestational diabetes mellitus depending on the definition of macrosomia: a retrospective cohort study.

Neonatal outcome in macrosomia and gestational diabetes mellitus depending on the definition of macrosomia: a retrospective cohort study.

期刊: BMC pregnancy and childbirth 日期: 2026-08-25 PMID: 42642730 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-026-09840-5 浏览: 12
作者: Meurer LL, Körber S, Stubert J
LL, M., S, K., & J, S. (2026). Neonatal outcome in macrosomia and gestational diabetes mellitus depending on the definition of macrosomia: a retrospective cohort study.. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-09840-5
LL M, S K, J S. Neonatal outcome in macrosomia and gestational diabetes mellitus depending on the definition of macrosomia: a retrospective cohort study.. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2026; doi: 10.1186/s12884-026-09840-5
LL M, S K, J S. Neonatal outcome in macrosomia and gestational diabetes mellitus depending on the definition of macrosomia: a retrospective cohort study.[J]. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-026-09840-5.
@article{ll2026,
  author = {Meurer LL and Körber S and Stubert J},
  title = {Neonatal outcome in macrosomia and gestational diabetes mellitus depending on the definition of macrosomia: a retrospective cohort study.},
  journal = {BMC pregnancy and childbirth},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1186/s12884-026-09840-5},
  note = {PMID: 42642730},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Meurer LL
AU  - Körber S
AU  - Stubert J
TI  - Neonatal outcome in macrosomia and gestational diabetes mellitus depending on the definition of macrosomia: a retrospective cohort study.
T2  - BMC pregnancy and childbirth
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.1186/s12884-026-09840-5
AN  - PMID:42642730
ER  - 

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Gestational diabetes increases the risk of neonatal macrosomia, which is associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity. However, the definition of macrosomia is inconsistent and includes both a fixed weight limit and a gestational age-dependent percentile. This study aimed to evaluate the association between different definitions of macrosomia and short-term neonatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, 882 women with gestational diabetes and a singleton pregnancy were included. Adverse neonatal outcome was defined as 5-min Apgar score below eight and/or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. We compared three different definitions of macrosomia: 1.) birthweight ≥ 4000 g, 2.) birthweight > 90th percentile, and 3.) length-related birthweight > 90th percentile. Eutrophic newborns served as controls and small-for-gestational-age infants were excluded. Additionally, umbilical artery Doppler parameters were explored. RESULTS: Overall, 220 out of 882 newborns (24.9%) met at least one definition of macrosomia: 129 (14.6%) with birthweight ≥ 4000 g, 126 (14.3%) with birthweight > 90th percentile, and 205 (23.2%) with length-related birthweight > 90th percentile. Short-term adverse neonatal outcome occurred in 6.2% (n = 55). In the total cohort, macrosomia was not associated with adverse outcome. Newborns with a birthweight > 90th percentile showed a higher, but not statistically significant, rate of adverse outcome (odds ratio (OR) 1.5 [0.8-3.1], p = 0.231). In analyses restricted to macrosomic infants, those with birthweight > 90th percentile had higher rates of adverse outcome compared with those ≤ 90th percentile (8.7% vs. 1.1%; OR 8.9, 95% CI 1.1-70.2). This remained associated after adjustment for preterm birth (adjusted OR 8.8, 95% CI 1.1-71.4), although preterm birth was the strongest overall predictor. The effect was mainly observed in infants weighing < 4000 g. Umbilical artery Doppler showed limited predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Macrosomia represents a heterogeneous group not uniformly associated with adverse short-term neonatal outcome. Within this cohort, birthweight > 90th percentile, particularly in infants < 4000 g, was associated with higher rates of adverse outcome, whereas fixed weight thresholds were not. Gestational age-adjusted definitions may better identify at-risk neonates.

AI 智能解读

相关文献

返回分类: 心血管 查看原文 (DOI)
已选择 0 篇文献