Safety of Coadministration of Continuous Infusions of Propofol and Clevidipine: A Multi-Site Retrospective Analysis.
MN, W., KC, C., K, H., NJ, V., ED, W., H, Y., AA, R., & CS, B. (2026). Safety of Coadministration of Continuous Infusions of Propofol and Clevidipine: A Multi-Site Retrospective Analysis.. Pharmacotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70196
MN W, KC C, K H, NJ V, ED W, H Y, et al. Safety of Coadministration of Continuous Infusions of Propofol and Clevidipine: A Multi-Site Retrospective Analysis.. Pharmacotherapy. 2026; doi: 10.1002/phar.70196
MN W, KC C, K H, et al. Safety of Coadministration of Continuous Infusions of Propofol and Clevidipine: A Multi-Site Retrospective Analysis.[J]. Pharmacotherapy. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/phar.70196.
@article{mn2026,
author = {Warfield MN and Cole KC and Heybati K and Vollmer NJ and Wieruszewski ED and Yadav H and Rabinstein AA and Brown CS},
title = {Safety of Coadministration of Continuous Infusions of Propofol and Clevidipine: A Multi-Site Retrospective Analysis.},
journal = {Pharmacotherapy},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1002/phar.70196},
note = {PMID: 42666011},
}
TY - JOUR AU - Warfield MN AU - Cole KC AU - Heybati K AU - Vollmer NJ AU - Wieruszewski ED AU - Yadav H AU - Rabinstein AA AU - Brown CS TI - Safety of Coadministration of Continuous Infusions of Propofol and Clevidipine: A Multi-Site Retrospective Analysis. T2 - Pharmacotherapy PY - 2026 DO - 10.1002/phar.70196 AN - PMID:42666011 ER -
INTRODUCTION: Patients often receive propofol for sedation and clevidipine for hypertension in the intensive care unit. Both agents are formulated as a lipid emulsion, which may increase the risk of hypertriglyceridemia and acute pancreatitis with their coadministration. We aimed to determine the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia and acute pancreatitis with concurrent administration of propofol and clevidipine and identify patient risk factors for hypertriglyceridemia. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study of adult patients (≥ 18 years old) receiving concurrent propofol and clevidipine infusions for ≥ 6 h. The primary outcome was the frequency of triglyceride levels greater than 400 mg/dL and acute pancreatitis. The secondary outcome was risk factors associated with hypertriglyceridemia during concurrent propofol and clevidipine infusions until both infusions had been discontinued. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess risk factors of hypertriglyceridemia in patients receiving concurrent propofol and clevidipine infusions. RESULTS: Across 1,226 patients, the median duration of infusion overlap was 12.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 8.3, 22.7] hours. The mean age of the cohort was 59.6 [standard deviation (SD) 14.9] years, and 59.4% were male. Assuming those without a triglyceride level drawn did not have hypertriglyceridemia, hypertriglyceridemia after initiation of propofol and clevidipine infusion was found in 7.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3% to 9.3%] of the entire cohort. Twenty-six patients (2.1%) had a diagnosis of pancreatitis after initiation of lipid infusions, of which 12 cases were possibly infusion-related, and one case was likely infusion-related. After calculating the Naranjo Scale, all 13 cases of pancreatitis were possibly related to propofol or clevidipine infusions. Based on a multivariable logistic regression of those with a triglyceride level available, risk factors for hypertriglyceridemia included pancreatitis within the past 5 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.77, 95% CI, 1.23 to 6.23] and statin use (aOR 1.94, 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.34). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patients receiving concurrent propofol and clevidipine, the frequency of hypertriglyceridemia and acute pancreatitis was low. Further comparative studies are warranted to assess the risk of pancreatitis with the addition of clevidipine to propofol.